Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Route 6 (GRTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Greater Richmond Transit Company#Numerical list of routes. Guy (Help!) 15:18, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Route 6 (GRTC)

Route 6 (GRTC) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable bus route. Individual bus routes are generally not encyclopedic and with no independent coverage this fails general notability. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:23, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Then all MTA bus lines fail "notability"... Quidster4040 (talk) 13:52, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy redirect to Greater Richmond Transit Company#Numerical list of routes. I agree, all articles for MTA bus lines should not exist and should be redirected back to the list page. See Category:Redirects from New York City area bus routes. —Мандичка^YO 😜 08:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non notable bus route, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 20:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Davey2010.Charles (talk) 20:24, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.