Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RoundMenu
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:28, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
RoundMenu
- RoundMenu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The list of references, the ones I've sampled, are all press release material. This is an internet startup, with a welter of PR, but no solid notability. The long list of pseudo-references persuaded me against Speedy Deletion as a non notable entity, but it probably does qualify for that route. Fiddle Faddle 11:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 05:34, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 06:15, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non-notable, and no references not of self-promotional nature. Caffeyw (talk) 10:04, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.