Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald Armbrust

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 22:07, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald Armbrust

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP sources since 2011 but no updates added. Online search confirms actor doesn't have GNG or WP:ENT. HM Wilburt (talk) 17:17, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:12, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:12, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:12, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:12, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:CCSI#ACTOR. Pointy-nomination. No questions about extra sources anywhere. The Banner talk 11:30, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Banner, "Meeting" that may be sufficient to survive CSD A7, but not AfD per WP:NACTOR. Adam9007 (talk) 00:10, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No proof that he had a major role in multiple notable films. SL93 (talk) 21:32, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:22, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR due to lacking sustained WP:SIGCOV or having major roles in multiple notable productions. He's just not notable. Newshunter12 (talk) 08:09, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Does not meet WP:GNG . Even if he was notable the article is only a line and not telling us anything. Alex-h (talk) 09:37, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.