Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Rogge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Unsourced biography of a living person. No evidence sources exist. Wily D 07:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Rogge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An actor with no indications of notability. A string of minor (1 episode) appearance with one exception: a recurring (but not main) role in the series Power Rangers Lightspeed Rescue. No evidence of any significant coverage in any reliable third party sources. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:19, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Let the page stay. Outside of his work in Power Rangers Lightspeed Rescue, Ron Rogge has also done voice work in various anime projects. Rtkat3 (talk) 12:16, June 28 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Keep" - Not sure i fully understand this process of deletion, or why this is an issue. Not many actors can claim over 110 episodes of TV credits, as well as 3 dozen film appearances, and this includes a series regular role, and many recurring roles on major TV shows. (Even the reasoning of "deletion considering" as posted above has poor and incorrect facts quoted!) The only reason this is a discussion, because your information was so far behind, it was being up-dated, and someone (WikiDan61 maybe) decided question the updates, and not only remove the CORRECT new info being added, but challenge the rest that has been posted for years...? Odd for an information services that now seems to be detering those from trying to change and up-date information responsibly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.136.94.38 (talk) 07:29, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It was not my intention to remove any information from the article -- that happened because of an edit conflict and the lost material has been restored. As for the reasons for the deletion nomination, prolificity is not in itself a cause of notability. If the volume of Rogge's work is so significant, than an independent writer should have picked up on that and written something about it in a reliable source. The fact is that IMDb is not considered a reliable source in establishing notability, since the filmographies there can (and often are) faked. I do not believe that to be the case here, and I am making no accusations, I am just pointing out Wikipedia guidelines. Since no reliable sources can be found, there isn't enough fact on which to verify this article. If anyone can find sources that have not yet been identified, they are welcome to do so. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:53, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:37, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete A string of random one-shot roles doesn't confer notability even if the roles are attached to a notable series. When and if we get a notable role which is covered reliably then we can conisder it. Right now though, being prolific doesn't make you notable if nobody wants to talk about your roles. tutterMouse (talk) 11:58, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:38, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unsourced BLP of a not really notable actor--Jac16888 ^Talk 17:48, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unsourced BLP with no sources added after three weeks at AfD. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:12, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.