Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romy Johnson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:56, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Romy Johnson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:PROD removed without explanation, so over here to do this the long way. Obvious vanity page, which appears to be sourced entirely to fake news websites and reprinted press releases. Although the SPA that removed the prod notice claims that reliable sources exist I can find no evidence of them. While I can't say for sure and WP:AGF and all that, this looks like an absolutely straightforward case of undeclared paid editing using reprinted press releases on assorted churnalism sites to manufacture pseudonotability. ‑ Iridescent 17:13, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ‑ Iridescent 17:13, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ‑ Iridescent 17:13, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. ‑ Iridescent 17:13, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - I couldn't even find a mention in a Proquest of many Canadian sources. Possible scam? Nfitz (talk) 03:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No WP:SIGCOV on the 22-year old subject by any proper RS. There are bits from low-grade online blogs like London Daily Post [1] (not an RS), but little else. Seems like Wikipedia is part of his promotional platform, and an important plank in establishing his notability – it should be the other way around. Britishfinance (talk) 14:15, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per all of the above Spiderone 06:24, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.