Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rome High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, no support for deletion now, nomination has been withdrawn, non admin closure. Davewild 07:51, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rome High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

another non notable school, while it proports the football team is one of the best in state, there are no sources to back this up, and if they are number 7 how they they be one of the best (sorry if I sould bitey). But I am nom'ing it due to no notability. Phgao 12:56, 10 October 2007 (UTC) Issue has been addressed. Phgao 03:57, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Keep meets the (embarrassingly low) standards for notability of U.S. schools. JJL 14:12, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speaking only for myself, i'd strongly support these same standards be applied to any school of similar level regardless of nationality.--Cube lurker 04:25, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per JJL. I will reconsider if sources are added that assert notability. CRGreathouse (t | c) 15:05, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, I've added a few new references which I believe help establish the school's notability, [1] [2] [3] [4], and per Notability {schools) arguments. Dreadstar † 18:25, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per the changes made by Dreadstar, the school now meets our notability and verifiability guidelines. Burntsauce 20:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep With Dreadstar's work it now looks like a solid high school article.--Cube lurker 21:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Seems to meet notability. Personally I think specific notability guidelines probably need to be created for schools, since this is an oft-recurring question. Nice work, Dreadstar. :) --Moonriddengirl 23:03, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep Great work by D.Star! Please speedy close this. Phgao 03:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Author Gdk411 03:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh, wow! Thanks for the great compliments, everyone! Dreadstar † 05:04, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep It's amazing what can be accomplished when one's goal is to improve the encyclopedia by improving articles. Great work! Alansohn 05:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.