Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rolligon

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 16:08, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rolligon

Rolligon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure this meets notability guidelines. Nerd1a4i (talk) 01:18, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 06:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 06:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 06:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 06:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alaska-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 06:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 06:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep I do see a reasonable number of references and some considerable interest at the time they came out, but the article is inaccurate: the rolligon is the whole vehicle, not just the tires. Mangoe (talk) 16:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The references presently included are certainly on the weak side but I've found this which makes the notability look OK to me. There also look to be references in several books but I can only see snippets so couldn't be sure how detailed they are. Thincat (talk) 22:29, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'd forgotten I have a WP:Wikipedia Library subscription to newspapers.com that just started today. There are oodles of articles extending over many years. Here is just a start.[1][2][3][4][5][6] Thincat (talk) 22:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.