Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Penumatsa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Per author's request -- RoySmith (talk) 22:41, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rohit Penumatsa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:FILMMAKER. All the blue linked films in the filmography have been recently included by the article creator. Not enough significant coverage in reliable sources that may confirm notability as per WP:GNG. Hitro talk 12:22, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have provided the article with all reliable and third-party sources. Request you to re-consider and untag deletion. Mind Sweepr12 (talk) 12:28, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is just a deletion discussion. Wikipedia community will discuss and reach a consensus in 7 days. If it is decided that this article should be kept then it won't be deleted. Currently, I do not think that the subject is meeting inclusion guidelines. Hitro talk 12:34, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Extremely minor or nonexistent mention of the subject in the RSs given. Article appears true, open to change opinion if good sources were found, but that doesn't look likely. It seems 'Sasi' would be more likely to qualify for an article than this guy, some of the sources are primiarily focused on him, but barely mention Rohit. 92.3.155.60 (talk) 13:07, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The very first citation directly states about Rohit as the Filmmaker working on Trilogy with Sasi(Sharat Kumar), citations are placed with respect to the facts, If the article is talking about film Sheesh Mahal which is directed by Camp Sasi and Rohit is associated in some other way, that article shall speak more about sasi than rohit. Yet, there are other article which talk about Rohit as good as sasi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mind Sweepr12 (talk • contribs) 13:15, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I understand. The citations are accurate, but they don't show that Rohit is notable. He just doesn't seem to be anywhere near famous enough for an article. Looks like the only slightly notable thing he's been involved with is the flim Sheesh Mahal, and the few good sources on that are mostly about the film itself & the director. I'm not saying the information in the article is wrong, I'm saying the sources don't support Rohits' notability. 92.3.155.60 (talk) 13:23, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's coz they both are a team and have done more projects together than alone, and Rohit penumatsa has spend moretime as a writer and editor. please suggest if I should rename the article to Rohit & Sasi as thats how they're known usually. Mind Sweepr12 (talk) 13:35, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as mentioned in the above comment, all those movies/links talking about Sasi, Rohit/Avanti Ruya is the editor for all of those films, Hence the article should stay! Mind Sweepr12 (talk) 16:00, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails notability, as noted in Wikipedia guidelines "Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article" and in this opinion does not have suitable coverage or recognition at this time. Earnsthearthrob (talk) 20:32, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move as its not ready/suitable yet, request moving it to draft space, for me to work on it further and the resubmit later in time. Mind Sweepr12 (talk) 22:22, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:35, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:35, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.