Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Brainard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:45, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Roger Brainard

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

With all due respect for Mr Brainard's musical accomplishments, they do not appear to have attracted much coverage in reliable sources. —S Marshall T/C 17:46, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —S Marshall T/C 17:46, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unsourced BLP, I see no reliable sources after a quick search. — {{u|Bsoyka}} ^talk 18:15, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agree with nom, poor attempt at promotion. Oaktree b (talk) 01:38, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I also agree with nom, does not meet notability. MartinWilder (talk) 20:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've struck this !vote because sockpuppets don't get to take part in AfDs.—S Marshall T/C 16:36, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Not enough coverage by reliable sources. Alex-h (talk) 13:21, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.