Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockstar Japan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:17, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rockstar Japan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As documented and discussed here. Cited IGN source only mentions "Rockstar Japan" in a sentence that also includes false information, since Localization was always handled by Rockstar Lincoln since its renaming in 2002. All sources that were previously mentioned do not mention a "Rockstar Japan", not even the Japanese Rockstar Games website. The only two further sources that at least included the phrase "Rockstar Games", as detailed in the discussion, simply misinterpreted Rockstar's presence at the Tokyo Game Show, which was handeled by Capcom, as something that could be "Rockstar Japan". Conclusion: The company does not and did never exist, wherefore this page should be deleted. Lordtobi (✉) 20:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 20:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 20:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 20:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – No Rockstar Japan seems to exist, so even a redirect would be misleading. We might already be dealing with minor WP:Citogenesis going on. ~Mable (chat) 21:12, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of proof they exist. Articles can and have been wrong and/or misleading and should always be fact checked by Wikipedia editors for this reason. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 22:24, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Regardless of existence, there's no sources to prove it meets the WP:GNG. Sergecross73 msg me 02:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there's literally no significance aside from the fact it was simply involved with the company listed. SwisterTwister talk 22:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.