Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockdust
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Dipankan (Have a chat?) 04:07, 17 May 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]
- Rockdust (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to be more advertising than attributable facts Lithopsian (talk) 20:47, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The topic appears to be notable, and any content issues fixable. --Lambiam 11:33, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:23, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Google scholar finds 561 hits for rockdust fertilizer. That seems more than enough to form the basis of an encyclopedic article. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:09, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.