Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock On 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rock On!!#Sequel . No objections to anyone reverting me providing the filming's begun and there's sources to back it up. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 02:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rock On 2

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NFF: "Films that have not ... commenced principal photography should not have their own articles". The article was deprodded by an IP editor who also added to the article an assertion that principal photography has started but the reference provided in fact confirms that it has not. RichardOSmith (talk) 06:21, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Rock On!!#Sequel. Chander 15:12, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- That's a good proposal. RichardOSmith (talk)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect temporarily to and expand and source at Rock On!!#Sequel until filming has been confirmed. The project is getting enough coverage to meet WP:NFF (paragraph 3) once we know it is filming. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 23:03, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.