Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robi Hager

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:25, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Robi Hager (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deleted once through Prod, so ineligible again for that route. Gets some mentions, but not enough in-depth coverage to show they pass GNG, and the roles they have had do not support NACTOR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:05, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not seeing GNG, he was in casts with other members, but not enough coverage for him alone. Anthony Rapp in the first ref is now in Star Trek Discovery; this fellow was (and is) just a Broadway performer. Oaktree b (talk) 15:02, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, and Theatre. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:58, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Hi! I began this article stub as part of this year's LGBTQ+ WikiScholar training, and my instructor said he passed GNG. His productions Little Duende and Las Silhuetas are scheduled to come out this theatre season (presumably in the next few months), so could the article remain a stub until more sources are published regarding that show? Thank you all for your help and your advice and please have a nice day! Lotus S. Tem (talk) 13:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  It depends on how notable those productions are, and how significant his role is in them. At best, he might be notable in the future, but doesn't pass GNG right now. However, if the article is decided to be deleted, you might ask that it be sent to draft, in the hopes that in the future he does attain GNG status. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:12, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Draft seems TOOSOON based on the explanation. A draft could be ok. Oaktree b (talk) 13:50, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.