Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Ivie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep — nomination withdrawn and no !votes to delete. (non-admin closure) XOR'easter (talk) 15:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Ivie

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Doesn't meet WP:PROF or WP:GNG.~~ Boleyn (talk) 21:47, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:58, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:20, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The article as nominated didn't include a case for notability and could have been an A7 speedy deletion, but now I have added four published books so it looks like there probably is a case to be made. I don't have time to search for reviews right now but I strongly suspect he passes WP:AUTHOR for his multiple books on political dissent and political rhetoric, which look to be from reputable presses and likely have multiple published reviews. I will formulate an actual opinion once I have time to do a proper search for those reviews. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:54, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I just added 20 reliably published and in-depth reviews of five books to the article. That's easily enough for WP:AUTHOR for me. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination per David Eppstein's excellent work. Boleyn (talk) 07:37, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.