Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Bullock (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:56, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Bullock (actor)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite the best efforts of myself and other editors in our attempts to improve coverage about pornographic actors in the wake of the pornography biography notability guidelines being deprecated, Robert Bullock and his pseudonyms do not pass WP:GNG. We have only been able to find minor mentions of the subject. Now, perhaps folks want to see winners of AVN Best Actor be inherently notable, but, at this point, Mr. Bullock does not pass our general notability guidelines. Thanks for your reviews and assuming good faith in our efforts. Missvain (talk) 18:10, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Missvain (talk) 18:10, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Missvain (talk) 18:10, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Missvain (talk) 18:10, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I think it's quite possible that sufficient sources exist if someone had the right sources from his era handy, but there's absolutely nothing sourceable online nor an ability to confirm that sources do exist elsewhere. The Drover's Wife (talk) 18:21, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:21, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC) [reply]

Delete a non-notable actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:57, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources available atm to satisfy notability requirements. Mattg82 (talk) 22:36, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since subject fails WP:NACTOR and even WP:GNG. No disambiguation page in the future of Bullock's, then. -The Gnome (talk) 23:44, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.