Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Road-hugger
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete (no category supplied) as dicdef and neologism by Lectonar. Non-admin closure --Pgallert (talk) 12:56, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Road-hugger
- Road-hugger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Dictionary term which, if it has widespread usage, belongs on Wiktionary not here. NtheP (talk) 22:53, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I haven't found Road-hugger in any dictionary. It is a term that came up in a discussion about the removal of the Robert Moses Parkway in Niagara Falls. It is a term used to counteract "Tree Huggers" which, is already a Wikipedia page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danldavis (talk • contribs) 01:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:12, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:12, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I have put it up for speedy deletion. Worth a try maybe? It is a neologism. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 02:46, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.