Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rivista

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 16:39, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rivista

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

orphan, unsourced one-line stub about an apparently non-notable web content management system. A lot of false positives, in the sense of "revue" or "magazine" in Spanish/Italian languages, but I was only able to find a couple of trivial mentions in niche magazines about this web application. Cavarrone 12:27, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:GNG and suffers from WP:MILL issues, thus should be deleted per WP:NOTCATALOG. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 06:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Software (CMS) stub article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search for Godengo Rivista turns up PR, incidental mentions, and blogs, but no significant RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 09:32, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.