Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ripple20

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ripple20

Ripple20 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

is mostly copy and paste; not notable enough. most sources are notifications of the vulnerability under discussion Maccore Henni user talk Respond using tb, please. 16:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  18:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:G12 104.7.152.180 (talk) 03:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE Aaron Liu (talk) 20:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I don't see how this is a copy/paste or copyvio. I created this page from multiple sources and the copyvio report shows that it is unlikely to be a copyright violation. Additionally, there is more information about this vulnerability now than when the page was first created, so I believe that it is still notable and the article can be expanded. —Ost (talk) 20:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above. Earwig only brought up 2 reverse-copies. Aaron Liu (talk) 17:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: earwig didn't turn up anything useful, copyright problems should be sorted out at Wikipedia:Copyright problems, not here. Found sources such as [1], [2]. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 16:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above. Cos ^{(X + Z)} 16:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.