Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riju Jhunjhunwala

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:36, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Riju Jhunjhunwala

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of living person who does not satisfy general notability or political notability. Both a draft and an article have been created, possibly to prevent moving the article into draft space. None of the references in the article are independent significant coverage. They include passing mentions, an interview, and profiles of his company and his foundation. It has not been necessary to check reliability of sources, but many of them are in the Times of India, which is not considered reliable, but it has not been necessary to check reliability of sources, because they do not pass the independent secondary significant coverage test.

Number	Reference	Remarks	Independent	Significant	Reliable	Secondary
1	Myneta.info	A profile of political candidate information	Yes	No	Probably	No
2	EconomicTimes of Times of India	Long story, but did not find mention of subject	Yes	No, might be a passing mention	Probably not	No
3	WSJ.com	Company profile listing subject as chairman	Yes	No	Yes	No
4	EconomicTimes of Times of India	Did not find mention of subject	Yes	No, might be a passing mention	Probably not	No
5	Indianexpress.com	Story about Panama Papers, passing mention of subject	Yes	No, passing mention	Yes	Yes
6	EconomicTimes of Times of India	Passing mention of subject in long story	Yes	No, passing mention	Probably not	No
7	EconomicTimes of Times of India	404 error		No
8	Business Standard	Profile of subject's company	Yes	No	Yes	No
9	EconomicTimes of Times of India	Another corporate profile	Yes	No	Probably not	No
10	EconomicTimes of Times of India	An interview with the subject	No	Yes	Probably not	No
11	DaijiWorld	Profile of foundation established by subject	Yes	Not of subject	?	No
12	Jawahar Foundation	Web site of subject's foundation	No	Not of subject		No
13	The Times of India	News story about an election which the subject ran in and lost	Yes	No	Mostly not	Yes
14	The Times of India	Story about his wedding	Yes	Not with respect to GNG	Probably not	No
15	News.abplive.com	Story about his wedding	Yes	Not with respect to GNG	?	No

The draft has 8 footnotes, which are mostly the same as in the article, and a URL dump, which has not been checked.

Either the article can be simply deleted, or the draft can be deleted and the article moved into draft space. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:32, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Business, and India. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:32, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:52, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per Nom's detailed examination. -- Otr500 (talk) 10:29, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per available Significant coverage, the subject passes WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. Below is the list of published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. And passes WP:THREE.

https://myneta.info/loksabha2019/candidate.php?candidate_id=11147 https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/stocks/news/stocks-that-may-not-have-achche-din/articleshow/69464219.cms https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/IN/XNSE/RSWM/company-people/executive-profile/86357100 https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/13-of-25-seats-in-rajasthan-to-go-to-polls-on-monday-115-candidates-in-fray/articleshow/69083194.cms https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/cons-products/garments-/-textiles/pli-for-man-made-fibre-technical-textile-to-boost-sectors-growth-says-rswm-cmd/articleshow/83430692.cms https://www.business-standard.com/company/heg-251/info https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/panama-papers-bhilwara-group-panama-papers-india-list-mossack-fonseca-bhilwara-group-of-companies-2785032/ https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/heg-ltd/infocompanymanagement/companyid-13630.cms https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/ground-level-problems-can-enable-development/articleshow/74795027.cms https://www.daijiworld.com/news/newsDisplay?newsID=936764 https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/elections/lok-sabha-elections-2019/rajasthan/news/songs-music-dance-to-woo-voters-in-ajmer/articleshow/68772828.cms https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/events/delhi/A-grand-wedding-reception/articleshow/6002713.cms https://news.abplive.com/movies/salman-khan-in-bina-kaks-daughter-amritas-wedding-throwback-pics-is-something-you-cant-miss-1001809 https://www.newsnationtv.com/india/news/jawahar-foundation-empowering-women-in-rajathan-for-a-brighter-future-258168.html
Thefinaldestiny (talk) 08:53, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep after analysis of all the references provided by the creator, i can find few significant coverage that passes WP:THREE and i can say the subject passes WP:GNG. DMySon (talk) 04:59, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: As per above article passes WP:ANYBIO. MickyShy (talk) 10:58, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The sources provided don't help exactly. Several WP:TOI sources aren't explicitly reliable. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 13:16, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:29, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing notable in the sources as examined. Oaktree b (talk) 14:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets Wikipedia's WP:RS. There are many sources which are independently written these are in published reliable sources. 1. The Wall Street Journal - It is a general reliable sources as discussed in Perennial sources, 2 Indian Express resource accepted as reliable per WP:INDIANEXP. 3. Economic Times considered as generally reliable and notable. And passes WP:THREE. JoyStick101 (talk) 07:13, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The keep votes simply repeat the same links questioned in the source analysis without explaining why. Of the WP:THREE sources provided in the previous vote, WSJ is a simple company listing; ET articles are interviews and IE just a quote. Hemantha (talk) 18:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment After doing a close analysis of all the references i would go with Robert McClenon. And changing my vote to Delete. DMySon (talk) 04:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Due to source analysis by Robert McClenon. MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:41, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note: Struck various sock !votes, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GermanKity. --Blablubbs (talk) 08:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note: DMySon is a sock of GermanKitty and was blocked today, 3 May 2022. He reviewed his own article (this article) on New Page Patrol. Reverted. --Whiteguru (talk) 01:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing notable in the sources as examined.--Whiteguru (talk) 01:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Robert's excelent source analysis NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 02:22, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per Nom's source analysis. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:50, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.