Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rickroll'd A La Chilena
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 23:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Rickroll'd A La Chilena (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nonnotable parody of Rickrolling; no indication of meeting the notability criteria at WP:WEB. The "sources" provided are 3 forums and the website itself. The two sites listed under "Further reading" don't mention this parody. —Angr 05:14, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Angr 08:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable YouTubecruft. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:17, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Material was already reverted from main Rickroll article twice. Contributor is the same person who made the video. Nonsense material. Video of people dancing to song has nothing to do with Rickrolling. Rurik (talk) 08:52, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable as above, sources are not reliable. --Deadly∀ssassin 09:23, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 10:05, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as trivial commentary on internet phenomenon. AlexTiefling (talk) 16:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete absolutely and completely fails WP:WEB, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:N, and almost certainly WP:COI and WP:SPAM as well. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:59, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails various content guidelines and policies listed above. Bill (talk|contribs) 20:14, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.