Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Daniels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is that the subject of the article has not received the significant coverage in independent, reliable sources needed to satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The subject was also not found to meet any of the additional notability criteria for entertainers at this time. Mz7 (talk) 04:36, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Daniels

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to meet WP:ENTERTAINER. Most of the sources I could find were about Rick Daniels the publisher, who is not the subject of the article. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject lacks coverage in reliable sources. Most of the page's current references are to Soundcloud - not reliable. Meatsgains (talk) 16:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:OUTCOMES. We almost always delete stubs about regular local DJs, radio personalities, etc. Notability is not inherited by whom one interviews except in truly rare circumstances. Bearian (talk) 02:54, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - He does not seem to meet the notability criteria for WP:Entertainer. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:41, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.