Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richie Stephens (actor) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Richie Stephens (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

UPE from indeffed editor. Non notable bit part actor. Does not have multiple significant roles in notable productions. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Claim from last afd of significant parts failed to identify any. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:15, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:40, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:40, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:40, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:40, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep this is a person who passes WP:NACTOR. Has had substantial roles on television series, in movies and in music videos. The article has reliable sources. Wm335td (talk) 21:37, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • What roles? duffbeerforme (talk) 11:49, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:NACTOR. Just bits parts and music videos. Spleodrach (talk) 18:14, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I may circle back to see if I can find more. Lightburst (talk) 04:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a non-notable individual, lacks significant roles in notable productions. Not every person credited has a significant role.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:23, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - run of the mill roles in music videos and the like, fails WP:NACTOR by a mile. Bearian (talk) 01:04, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG & possesses very little coverage of which aren’t even reliable sources. So I’m inclined to uphold the rationale of both Bearian & Johnpacklambert Celestina007 (talk) 23:33, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, No significant role , does not meet WP:GNG, Alex-h (talk) 08:10, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the above keep !vote claiming that NACTOR is met is undermined by the subject's own web site biography stating "He is best known for playing villains on TV and films" with no mention of any actual specific significant roles. A review of the actual roles in the filmogrpahy make it abundantly clear that the subject has not had significant roles. -- Whpq (talk) 13:01, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.