Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richie Rich (film series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:49, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Richie Rich (film series)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Draftify per WP:FILMSERIES, no comparative prose, just separate information on the two films with no reception for 2nd, redundant when have two individual articles Indagate (talk) 06:17, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Entertainment. Indagate (talk) 06:17, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, two films is not a "series" and this conveys no information worth keeping. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:06, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The individual articles are a better way to manage this information, as none of the cast or crew were the same between the theatrical film and the direct-to-video film, nor can their box office performance be compared (since the direct-to-video film had no box office results), nor can their critical reception be compared (since the direct-to-video film has no Rotten Tomatoes, Metacritic, or CinemaScore rating). --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:15, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I could see there being some justification for a franchise page, as there are films and television shows, but two films isn't really enough to justify a film article. I'd say merge pertinent content into the main article for the comics but there not much that really needs to be added. I would maybe add the cast table, limiting it to just those characters that were in both films, but I'm not entirely sure that's really necessary. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:04, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.