Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Ramirez (musician)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:55, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Richard Ramirez (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No extensive coverage in independent nor reliable sources, therefore non-notable. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 18:02, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The subject operates in a rather obscure field, but I added a couple of reviews from The Wire, which shows a level of international attention. I don't think they are enough to establish WP:MUSICBIO notability in themselves (as The Wire, to its credit, publishes a lot of wide-ranging reviews) but if someone turns up similar from another publication, that would take me to a "keep". AllyD (talk) 08:31, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. There are also several articles from the Houston Press ([1], [2], [3]), who describe him as a "legendary, cutting-edge and influential musician", and D magazine ([4]), which together with the coverage from Wire seems just enough to put him above the bar. --Michig (talk) 12:52, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Michig. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 22:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.