Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Hasse Davis

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:50, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Hasse Davis

Richard Hasse Davis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local businessman who served on his district council and his industry body, but not notable outside his region or industry. Scott Davis Talk 00:19, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Scott Davis Talk 00:27, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to his business, Copper Coast Wines. A non-notable individual with no coverage in independent sources. An OAM doesn't confer notability. Kb.au (talk) 05:56, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure that business meets WP:N either, but haven't decided to nominate it yet. I haven't found definite evidence whether the business survived the founder's death. --Scott Davis Talk 11:54, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - the web site for the brewery (oddly with Wines in the name) appears to be no more, but outside of some caravan trade group coverage when Mr. Davis passed away, there's no sufficient coverage for either him or the brewery. Both fail WP:GNG. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 22:43, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.