Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RevLeft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RevLeft

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonnotable political forum. No reliable secondary sources exist. Xcuref1endx (talk) 03:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - News found nothing, Books found one passing mention and a browser search found nothing good and websites I'm not familiar with. Not notable website. SwisterTwister talk 18:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:48, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:WEB - HighBeam and Google News found zero results, books most likely have no mention. Esquivalience ^t 02:53, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Seems to be just another internet forum with little influence. If the forum had more notability or influence, I'd say yes, but as it seems to be a circle-jerk of few tens of users, I can hardly see how this warrants inclusion. Solntsa90 (talk) 07:00, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.