Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retekulation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:34, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retekulation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't normally do product AfDs but this one jumped out at me as particularly problematic. There are all the usual issues: SPE creator, lack of good GHits, no sources, no GBook hits at all, promotional tone.... Just not seeing the notability. Mangoe (talk) 17:35, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The term "Retekulation" isn't even used on United Retek Corporation's site; "The Retek Process" being used instead. Their site also makes clear this is just a marketing term for one company. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 20:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 20:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - lack of coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 21:53, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.