Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reshape Reason

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. ✗plicit 23:28, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reshape Reason

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failing WP:NALBUMS#1. I'm unable to find suitable sources to justify keeping them. SWinxy (talk) 20:13, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the two other albums by Elitist for the same reason:

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music. SWinxy (talk) 20:13, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all three: Found no evidence of notability for any of these releases, nor the band behind them (now PROD'd). QuietHere (talk | contributions) 21:36, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.