Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Research
 | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no original research. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:10, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Research
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Research (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article should be deleted per WP:NOORIGINALRESEARCH. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:01, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Scorpions13256 (talk) 00:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Delete per WP:NOR. [4-1] Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:29, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Delete, citing "What is Original Research? Original research is considered a primary source". Thomas G. Carpenter Library, University of North Florida. Archived from the original on 9 July 2011. Retrieved 9 August 2014. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 01:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.