Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Report (nursing)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Concerns about lack of sourcing addressed per article improvements by Pontificalibus. (non-admin closure) I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 08:32, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Report (nursing) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essentially unsourced despite being tagged for over 2 years. No in-line citations. Contains opinions and reads like it is about how one hospital gives report. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 14:40, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep is a regular part of the job of a nurse, and is written about and described in detail in many books about nursing. Therefore, meets WP:GNG. The nom's argument is that it hasn't been improved in 2 years - see Nobody's working on it (or impatience with improvement). Tatterfly (talk) 15:00, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Plenty of sources, I also renamed the article per those sources, two of which I referenced in the article.--Pontificalibus (talk) 15:09, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep AFD is not cleanup. It is our editing policy to improve articles rather than deleting them. Warden (talk) 16:43, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:19, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: There are plenty of sources. There is also potential for expansion because of how many books this subject can be found in. Joe Chill (talk) 01:28, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - nursing topics, or for that matter, anything of interest to females, needs beefing up here at Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nursing in pakistan as a precedent. Bearian (talk) 17:48, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You better hurry over to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherrybrook Kitchen then, we all know those females like grocery shopping.--Pontificalibus (talk) 18:38, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.