Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renderforest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G11 and A7. DGG ( talk ) 21:18, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renderforest

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, advertising, hoax, misinformation, potential COI. Website has basically no reliable sources pointing to its notability, all refs are links to what looks like paid PR on blogspam sites. Information is not remotely accurate even to what is stated in the dubious articles, and the author's use of certain phrases mirrors those in "interviews" with the creator of the software. He deleted the CSD template yesterday. Author appears to be in good faith but is not responding to discussion, and continues to remove maintenance templates. Jergling (talk) 14:26, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

COMMENT: The editor placed a CSD tag on the page and then removed it 30 minutes later after I apologized for assuming bad faith. Then he put it back up as soon as I logged off for the weekend. He's attempted, and failed, to circumvent deletion nominations 3 times now and I honestly can't tell if he's doing it maliciously or out of total confusion. Most of my original points still stand. Jergling (talk) 21:18, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:21, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 03:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.