Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rekha Luther
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rekha Luther (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Plus it is a blp with no clear refs. Boleyn (talk) 19:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:38, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:38, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:38, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:38, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:38, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:38, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - The article had some attempted references that were incorrectly copied as external links (now fixed). Anyway, the article looks like an attempted promotion for actress/model who is slowly getting her career started. She has a few fashion shoots and background appearances in movies, and a one-paragraph mention in Vogue India (footnote #3), but very little coverage that specifically comments on her career. We can go with "too soon" for now. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 21:05, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree that this looks like a case of WP:TOOSOON. -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete not notable in any of her roles as an entertainer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:02, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:TOOSOON, WP:ENT, and WP:SIGCOV. She seems to be very young and at the beginning of her career. There's no way her coverage is either that of a usual; entertainer or significant. Bearian (talk) 22:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.