Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reina Hispanoamericana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 21:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reina Hispanoamericana

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Not even 1 reference. DownAndUp (talk) 01:33, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A quick google search shows many articles on this topic. Most of them are in Spanish but there is sustained coverage of this event. Might be a good idea to contact the author and see if we can send it to draft if they don't have time to fix it right now. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 06:38, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 August 10. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:50, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards, Beauty pageants, Latin America, and South America. Shellwood (talk) 09:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Rationale from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mrs. International (pageant): "Since this is essentially an event run by a commercial organization, the appropriate guideline is WP:NCORP. [References] focus either on the contestants (past and present) and their "causes" or opinions or is based on PR/Announcements. Most of the references have no "Independent Content" as per WP:ORGIND as the content is provided by affiliated sources and the rest fail WP:CORPDEPTH as trivial content." "Sources provided mainly only reference the organization as existing and mostly talk about whatever contestant they're highlighting. Confirmation that it exists is not notability." DownAndUp (talk) 04:11, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.