Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regional News Group

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 15:28, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regional News Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I sent this new article to draft yesterday and it has been moved back into mainspace. It is potentially notable but none of the sources in the article are about the subject. Briefly, ABS-CBN lost its broadcast franchise (all of the sources are about this) and various regional services have been set up/continued by former employees (none of the sources are about this). If the subject can be developed it should be draftified, otherwise it should be deleted. Mccapra (talk) 13:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 13:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 13:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 13:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 13:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Reverted bad non-admin closure per WP:NACD. The user who closed the discussion was directly involved and had no business pursing the action.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:22, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and don't move to draftspace. THe actual subject of the article has one source, that to a Facebook page, failing WP:RS. All other references are for background fluff that can be, and is, already discussed elsewhere. That means we'd be left with a draft with a single reference to Facebook. If anyone wants to host it on their own user space they should be free to do so, though. Howard the Duck (talk) 22:29, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:52, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
SeanJ 2007, please strike this !vote or your previous !vote on this discussion. Only one !vote per user - even if you have changed your sig to a slightly different name in the meantime. Cabayi (talk) 14:18, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Cabayi: Haha, Ok! SeanJ 2007 (talk) 14:56, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.