Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Refrigerate after opening

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Refrigerate after opening

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced essay/WP:OR, which is extra problematic as this topic is related to medical areas, where we want above-average quality. No footnotes, two not very reliably looking external links, tagged as needing more sources since 2012. If nobody can improve this, WP:ATD-R target to consider could be Food preservation perhaps? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:36, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Biology, and Medicine. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:36, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect This is a term used on food labels like "Made with real fruit". Im struggling to see this as an encyclopedic subject. Ben Azura (talk) 21:40, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. I think this is a likely enough search term to be worth redirecting. After reviewing associate articles I think Shelf life is probably the best target since it is mostly relevant content and could easily be expanded by a couple of sentences to mention this phrase explicitly. Eluchil404 (talk) 01:47, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Eluchil404 Sama author created now-deleted shake well :) Any ideas where to redirect that one? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not really. On the surface Food packaging seems the most relevant but doesn't really cover the relevant issues. A look at Outline of food preparation shows that we don't have any articles on sifting or mixing as they apply to cooking. At least that I can see. Somewhat surprising, but, as the saying goes, Wikipedia is WP:NOT a cookbook. Eluchil404 (talk) 03:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there are three different target articles suggested to Redirect this article to.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:28, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, an unreferenced personal essay that doesn't say anything that doesn't relate to food preservation in general. It's not worth redirecting as it's just an ordinary use of the English language. We might just as well redirect Permits entry of light to Window. Elemimele (talk) 13:45, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all the above, this sorry and unsurprisingly uncited essay has no place on Wikipedia; the topic of food preservation is sufficiently covered already, and this wouldn't be a sensible redirect. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as wholly unreferenced and lacking any evidence of notability. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 15:07, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.