Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reframe It (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Same result as last AfD. Daniel (talk) 01:37, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reframe It

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. Quoting from WP:NSOFT:

QUOTE In addition, although notability is not temporary, a burst of coverage (often around product announcements) does not automatically make a product notable.
Further nomination comment That seems to be the situation here, there was a burst of coverage in mostly technical sources, along with a mention in the New York Times, after which this software faded into obscurity, with the company eventually failing completely. I don't think true notability was ever achieved. Safiel (talk) 04:49, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Site is pretty much dead at this point, and does not appear to be notable enough to merit an article. Also, given that the project is dead, I don't see it meeting WP:NOTABLE in the future. Jab843 (talk) 06:37, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (rap) @ 12:41, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (discuss) @ 12:41, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.