Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Refitting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Renaming is an editorial decision. That can be discussed on the article's talk page. Ron Ritzman (talk) 17:33, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Refitting

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unsource dictionary definition with no indication of WP:notability noq (talk) 18:51, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is already more content here than a dicdef, and notability is clear; see for example [1][2] Melchoir (talk) 21:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. If this is kept it should be with a more specific title. Plenty of things other than boats can be refitted. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:31, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep "Refitting" is something that all ships have done to them at one time or another. This can be a very detailed and informative article with the proper expansion. Brad (talk) 08:31, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but move Topic not adequately covered in related articles and would probably be better in its own article anyway. But name change needed per Phil Bridger (current title would be better either as disambiguation or redirect). PWilkinson (talk) 09:35, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.