Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reed Tucker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reed Tucker

I'm not exactly certain that we need articles for every random radio skit character in a Grand Theft Auto game. Notable game? Oh, heck yes. Notable character? Not remotely. Moving to AfD since PROD was implicitly contested. Vianello (talk) 07:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Or merge back into GTA III article. I can't see how this will ever become notable. Jclemens (talk) 07:57, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I'm not sure if the character's really noteable enough to warrant even a merge. If there were a section on the radio skits specifically, or something else to offer precedent, maybe then. - Vianello (talk) 08:13, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:N. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 08:04, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:N, as notability is not asserted. Also per WP:V, as the "sources" are just footnotes that don't link to anything. This almost seems like an autobiography.... Happyme22 (talk) 08:31, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I haven't played the game, but I really don't think it's apt to be an autobiography. The material presented sounds pretty typical of the GTA radio skits. Maybe I'm wrong. - Vianello (talk) 09:40, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non notable character, dare say not even notable for merging to GTA III article. Sunderland06 (talk) 12:06, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:N and WP:COI. Make it go away. Proxy User (talk) 13:01, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It isn't a notable character at all -- Saggod (talk) 16:07, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- brew crewer (yada, yada) 16:03, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 22:27, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly. :P I seriously doubt there'd be even a single reliable source for this. Rehevkor ✉ 00:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Some charachters should have Wikipedia articles, like Mario. But not one-off side charachters. mattiator (talk) 01:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable character, although the game is. — Wenli ^{(reply here)} 03:18, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect back to the main article, unless someone can find some sources that demonstrate external notability. I doubt it though. Ford MF (talk) 15:53, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No real world significance or notability. Tottering Blotspurs (talk) 14:24, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.