Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redwood Mary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 13:26, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redwood Mary

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A PROD tag was removed and a large-scale edit attempting to bring this into Wikipedia's boundaries was reverted without comment. An examination of the long list of "references" reveals very little that is actually material to the precise topic or contributes in any way to the subject's notability only a single reference, that of a foundation's newsletter, seems to me to be at all useful. There are significant neutrality problems with the current incarnation and it is unlikely that pruning this to a neutral stub would stand in situ for long; I suggest that an absence of any information is better than potentially compromising our standards and retaining the brief stub which might be appropriate. Accounting4Taste:talk 22:42, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Could possibly be edited to NPOV but would still fail notability.--Chuunen Baka (talk) 08:27, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Nuujinn (talk) 14:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.