Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redline Coaches

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. / Withdrawn - As explained below I'd only searched Google News and nothing showed up .... Anyway sources have been found which I'll add to the article, Cheers, (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 12:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redline Coaches

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable bus company Fails GNG –Davey2010^Talk 00:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:35, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Yellow Dingo (talk) 02:47, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, leaning keep Davey, can you please outline the results of the searches you made for sources? Searching for this company in the National Library of Australia's Trove newspaper database returns about 40 potentially-useful news stories (though some may be about bus companies with a similar name). Nick-D (talk) 02:59, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are also a few not-particularly-useful recent stories on the website of the Mercury newspaper, of which [1] is the best. The ABC published this story on the firm in 2012 and this in 2007. Nick-D (talk) 05:13, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nick-D, I did search Google News however there's only irrelevant results & so I obviously assumed the obvious but thanks for managing to find sources, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 12:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.