Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redencion 911 (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 11:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redencion 911

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't meet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. 2018 AfD had zero participation, so was no consensus. 2008 was keep, but our standards were very low then and I still think a mistake was made. Only its 3rd time here, one AfD was a duplicate so speedy closed. Has been in CAT:NN for over 11 years. Boleyn (talk) 12:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Another non-notable band. Whoop-de-doo. I looked them up and could not find anything besides the usual unreliable stuff (Discogs, Facebook, Bandcamp, Google Play, Last.fm, Spotify, Rate Your Music), blog sites, download sites, trivial mentions and name checks. No reliable sources whatsoever. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 19:03, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG. Not a thing worth writing home about when I looked for sources. --Jack Frost (talk) 01:35, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.