Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redeemer (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 02:59, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redeemer (album)

Redeemer (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This was speedy deleted as CSD G11 spam. A DRV consensus overturned after the speedy was contested with reference to media reviews. This matter is submitted to AfD for full consideration. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 05:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: As per WP:MUSIC#Albums. No one has challenged Machinae Supremacy's notabilty. ¬rehevkor¬ 06:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep If the band is notable, there's no reason to get rid of their album, which was released on an imprint of a major label. -- Kicking222 14:36, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, notable band, notable album. Voretus^talk 14:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Definitely notable, and popular, within the SID revival band community. --Mperry 03:35, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And beyond. ¬rehevkor¬ 03:46, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep; Machinae Supremacy has a quite large fanbase, all of which I'm sure would count the band and this album as notable. « SCHLAGWERK^{Talk to me!} 06:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.