Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recycling in Israel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Six out of six comments stating a clear "keep" consensus. (non-admin closure) AmericanAir88^(talk) 15:29, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recycling in Israel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:NOTSTATS, this article is just a list of stats and regulations with no assertion of WP:NOTABILITY or any description of how recycling in Israel can be compared to any other country. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:06, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:07, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:07, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:07, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Obviously notable topic, that currently covers 2 laws in Israel (acts of legislation are usually assumed to pass GNG). Hewiki shows an abundance of additional content. Article could use expansion, but content is not in the TNT zone.Icewhiz (talk) 07:24, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep A patently notable topic. The fact that the article article needs improvement is not a valid argument for deletion.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:11, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Satisfies GNG. WP:NOT is simply not applicable. James500 (talk) 19:04, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Satisfies GNG. Needs development not deletion.Charles (talk) 08:34, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: the article is barebones, but the topic meets GNG, as can be seen via Google news preview: [1]. The article can be developed futher; no reason for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep there are enough references in the article as is to verify notability and the two laws that are listed do indeed distinguish recycling in Israel from recycling in other countries. Elspamo4 (talk) 17:01, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.