Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Caines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rebecca Caines

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

User:49ersBelongInSanFrancisco previously proposed this for deletion. I concur with their assessment: "Fails WP:ARTIST or GNG. Current sources are a university bio and a few primary source project pages. Google finds only a few passing references in independent media, such as passing references to shows." SmartSE (talk) 23:43, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:59, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saskatchewan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't see coverage meeting notability requirements. There are some published interviews but a lack of proper reviews, critical analysis, or other third-party sources. The article currently reads very much like it was written by its subject or someone close to her, and so would require rewrites even if sources were found. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:50, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 23:19, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the five sources come from two different sources. None of them are independent. A search turns up nothing but a healthy selection of republished autobiographies. Fails all notability tests. 104.163.147.121 (talk) 03:32, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:11, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I couldn't find enough WP:RS to establish WP:Artist. Theredproject (talk) 17:11, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not appear to pass NARTIST. L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:26, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.