Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RebarBID

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 01:28, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RebarBID

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The software is non-notable and the article is unreferenced. Fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 00:14, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 10:09, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 04:39, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software article of unclear notability lacking RS references. Search reveals no significant RS coverage. Page was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 19:35, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.