Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reba Shahid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 13:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reba Shahid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't find references. Doesn't look notable enough to warrant entry on WP. Saqib (talk) 15:34, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're going to find it tough when the author is an Urdu (or any non-English) journalist, in the audio format and/or an editor whose byline might not be as visible online. All three apply here. fredericknoronha (talk) 16:14, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 16:18, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 16:19, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this shows some results [1] but they are mostly written by the journalist rather than on her and that makes this article OR. However, this seems to be of value [2] though it is not enough alone to establish notability. But I think a week keep might be in order if there are more of these. --lTopGunl (talk) 16:38, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:40, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There's no indication of enough independent reliable sources for even the most basic notability, much less enough to support an accurate BLP. --RL0919 (talk) 20:38, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacks reliable sources and fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.