Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Realty Mogul

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 03:39, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Realty Mogul

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:CORP. Article was created by an WP:SPA advertising-only account with no other edits other than related to Realty Mogul. Has links but Relies on references to press releases, reprints, announcements and trivial coverage or mentions. It's nothing more than Self-promotion and product placement, which Wikipedia is WP:NOT. Hu12 (talk) 12:44, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now. The company is less than a year old, and the references provided are to non-mainstream or non-reliable sources - with the possible exception of this from the Los Angeles Business Journal. Maybe it's just WP:TOOSOON and the company will eventually develop significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, but it's not there yet. --MelanieN (talk) 03:32, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.