Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReTech

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete- the article has been speedy deleted under G7. This discussion is moot (NAC). Reyk YO! 08:18, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ReTech (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I dig cyberpunk, I really do, but I cannot find any indication this art project has attracted attention from more than social media, blogs, and minor online zines that are little better than blogs. The article makes an unreferenced claim about one piece (?) being a part of an exhibition at a museum (Grand Rapids Art Museum) and possibly winning (?) something called Artprize, but the best I can find for the former is [https://www.neondystopia.com/cyberpunk-art-photography/retech-cyberpunk-reclamation-art/, and for latter, well, nothing. I think it fails WP:GNG. If anyone can point out to a more reliable source covering this, please do. (On a related note, all the images are likely copyvios and I have started a Commons deletion discussion for them at Commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Diffman). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:52, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:19, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.