Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Stoney
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:21, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Ray Stoney (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:TOOSOON; Fails WP:NACTOR. Roles are either minor or in obscure works; references are passing mentions and databases. Nat Gertler (talk) 16:31, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:32, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 20:16, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:37, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Agreed, several of the references are insufficient and the best one would be the second from the top supporting his basketball career. Google News archives found one link also mentioning his basketball career here (third link from the top). When I added "actor" to my search, I found one small mention here, supporting his Delivery Boy Chronicles role and another small mention for that film here. This actor appears to have several roles through well-known TV programs so I believe this is a case of WP:TOOSOON, there are few reliable and significant sources to support an appropriate article. SwisterTwister talk 19:57, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.