Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Seggern

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:51, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ray Seggern

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the references cited in the article counts towards WP:GNG, and I can find nothing better online. Run-of-the-mill businessman. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 20:56, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing stated in the article constitutes an automatic free pass over our notability standards for broadcasters just because he exists, but the article is not reliably sourced well enough to get him over WP:GNG for it — all of the references are either primary sources, or brief blurbs which aren't substantive enough to count as GNG-assisting coverage. Bearcat (talk) 21:51, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see anything that supports notability. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:31, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.